| from
the acess desk
Greetings
to ACESS Members and friends of the Alliance. This is ACESS’s
first update for 2002 and it provides information on activities
that the Alliance has been working on since last year, in keeping
with its mission to mobilise support for a comprehensive social
security system for vulnerable children and their families. The
update identifies a range of actions that your organisation, institution
or community can take towards building a society which ensures that
the constitutionally guaranteed right of every child in South Africa
to social security can be brought into practice.
contents
acess:
a dynamic alliance
Just
under a year ago ACESS came into existence with a commitment to
building a broad based alliance of child rights activists and institutions
towards the goal for a Comprehensive Social Security System for
South Africa in which the needs of all vulnerable children and their
families would be addressed.
Over the past several months ACESS has had an opportunity to refine
its thoughts and recommendations based on the deliberations of that
historic meeting in Cape Town in March 2001. ACESS’s “FIRST
CALL FOR CHILDREN” makes two key recommendations -:
1st
Recommendation: ACESS believes that an essential ingredient
in the new social security system is the implementation of a Basic
Income Grant (BIG) for all adults and children in South Africa.
In such a system the state, via its taxation system, is able to
reclaim from those households who do not require the grant and in
this way the state avoids the situation of putting scarce resources
in the hands of the better off in our society. More importantly
such a system avoids the enormous and often wasteful costs of means
testing and also ensures that all eligible people are able to access
their grants.
2nd
Recommendation: It is acknowledged that to transform a
system requires careful and adequate planning and implementation.
This may take a considerable amount of time and the harsh reality
is that children and their families CANNOT WAIT.
The State has a Constitutional imperative [1] to provide social
security to children in need, as a matter of urgency. Currently,
the Child Support grant reaches only 7% of children in need, and
only 33% of those targeted. Thus ACESS makes a demand for the immediate
improvements to, and extension of the existing social security provisioning
to all children.
Some
of the key demands made by ACESS regarding the improvement and extension
of the existing grant system for children are-:
- All children
aged 0 to 18 years should be eligible for the CSG, with age
being the only eligibility criteria. The current means test
must be abolished.
- All children
should benefit from indirect social security, through services
such as free health care up to the age of 18 years and free
education if they cannot afford school fees.
- All caregivers
of children with special needs due to a health condition (disability
or chronic illness) should be provided with a Care Dependency
Grant. Eligibility for assistance should be based on need, in
terms of poverty, health condition and/or a compromised home
environment.
- Administration
of grants must be fast tracked and the requirements for registration
should be reviewed with specific regard to the problems in accessing
relevant documentation such as birth certificates and identity
documents.
- ACESS believes
that all children, whether they are non-citizens, temporary
residents or refugees should be able to access the grants.
This is in keeping with our ratification of the UN Convention
on the Rights of the Child which stipulates that:
“State Parties must respect and ensure the
rights set forth in the Convention to each child within their
jurisdiction without discrimination of any kind, irrespective
of the child’s or his/her parents legal guardians’
race, …. , national, ethnic or social origin, ……
, birth or other status”. (Article 2).

ACESS
now has a membership of over 65 organisations across South Africa.
While that represents a very substantial grouping of concerned stakeholders,
the ACESS network needs to be broadened even more, especially if
we are to convince decision makers that the views espoused by ACESS
have wide spread support.
| Action:
We have included a membership form with this newsletter to
enable you to go out and encourage others to join in this
effort. It is our responsibility to the children of South
Africa. |
1
Government of the RSA and others v. Grootboom & Others [2000(11)
BCLR 1169(cc)].
child
malnutrition in mt frere: the urgency of ensuring access to the
child support grant and increasing social security provisions for
all vulnerable household members
It
took a Special Assignment documentary programme in August 2001 on
the links between childhood malnutrition and the difficulties experienced
by primary caregivers in accessing the Child Support Grant to draw
the attention of the Ministry’s and Departments of Social
Development and Home Affairs to respond to the desperate needs of
large numbers of vulnerable children. ACESS played an extremely
crucial role in bringing media exposure to this issue initially
by drawing Special Assignments attention to this issue in the first
place and then through ACESS members providing considerable background
information to the producers of the show regarding the Child Support
Grants and problems experienced throughout the country.
The
TV documentary, reported on the work of the University of Western
Cape’s Public Health Programme, which in conjunction with
the Health Systems Trust and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical
Medicine had been conducting research into childhood malnutrition
in the Mt Frere region of the Eastern Cape Province.
The
critical importance of the timeous processing of the child support
grant was illustrated by the research findings. An observation by
the researchers illustrated this as follows -:
“If
the family had received the child support grant 10 months earlier
when they first applied, it is almost assured that this child
would not have needed to be hospitalised for severe malnutrition
several months later. Even with the new hospital treatment protocols,
this child had a one in three chance of dying from such a severe
condition, and the costs of emotional trauma to the family, and
an expensive hospitalisation to the health care system, would
have been avoided.”
(University
of Western Cape: Public Health Programme; Health Systems Trust
and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine: Study
of the Management of Severe Malnutrition, unpublished draft report,
2001.)
acess
response to mt frere
ACESS
welcomed the response of the Minister of Social Development in going
out to Mt Frere and in ensuring that certain activities were initiated
to address the problem. However ACESS took it a step further in
drawing the Ministers attention to the fact that the Mt Frere scenario
was not unique to the Eastern Cape and that it could be found elsewhere
in South Africa. Further ACESS made recommendations to the Minister
on actions which he could take to remove the obstacles to people’s
access to the child support grant, administrative obstacles which
in effect denied the very people for whom the grant was intended,
the right of access.
Since
September 2001, ACESS has communicated with the Minister and the
Department of Social Development on three occasions making recommendations
and offering its support in ensuring that administration of social
security does not thwart vulnerable people’s efforts to access
the grant. To date we have not had a response. At this stage and
in order to ensure that the constitutional rights to social security
are not denied, ACESS is considering other actions that it may able
to embark on.
It
must be noted that these efforts by ACESS were in addition to the
extensive submission, which we made to the state and parliament
on the Amendments to the Social Assistance Act Regulations. Copies
of this submission were circulated to ACESS members in July 2001.
acess
and the basic income grant coalition
As
we indicated at the very beginning ACESS is committed to the Basic
Income Grant as an effective social security mechanism for reaching
vulnerable children and their families. ACESS is a member of the
BIG Coalition and has participated in several activities in support
of the BIG. More recently ACESS participated in a workshop hosted
by the Economic Policy Research Institute (EPRI) on the affordability
and cost issues relating
implementing the BIG. We are hoping to share the report of this
workshop as soon as it is available.
northern
province - a problem of budgeting, a denial of rights
In
November 2001, ACESS became aware that a large number of old age
pensioners, disability grant recipients and children who qualified
for the child support grant (it was suggested by the Sowetan that
over 150 000 people were affected) were not receiving their grants
even though their grant applications had been received and processed.
The problem according to someofficials was that the Dept of Social
Development in the Northern Province had run out of budget and intended
beneficiaries were advised to come back in the new year to receive
their grants. The MEC for Health and Welfare, Mr Moloto was quoted
as saying …..
“It
should be expected that government might not have the money to
accommodate all who are supposed to be beneficiaries.”
ACESS,
working in partnership with the Legal Resources Centre and the National
Council for Child Welfare ensured that the Provincial and National
Government Authorities attention was drawn to this problem and a
response was requested as to how the matter would be addressed.
In response to media reports in November 2001 the MEC for Social
Development in Northern Province had blamed bad budgeting and lack
of adequate data on the number of beneficiaries for the problem.
However interestingly, it was the very same Mr Moloto in an address
to the NCOP in June 2001, during the policy debate on the Social
Development Budget vote who acknowledged that since 1994 his department
had struggled to quantify the numbers of beneficiaries eligible
for social assistance and hence had not been able to budget accordingly.
He advised the NCOP in June 2001 that this matter had now been rectified!
Table:
Actual changes in budget for the Northern Province in comparison
with National budget data for the period April – Dec 2001:
| |
Northern
Province |
National |
| OAP |
+6.6% |
+7.5% |
| DG |
+1.7% |
+17.2% |
| CSG |
-5.0% |
+55.7% |
(Source
SOCPEN data Dec 2001)
To
date ACESS has had no response from either the Provincial or National
Department.
acess
commitment to partnerships towards increasing take up rates of the
child support grant
Soul City and ACESS are currently exploring the idea of engaging
in activities aimed at increasing the take up rate of the child
support grant particularly in those provinces and areas where the
access is currently very low. This would be in partnership with
state parties. ACESS will keep you informed about its deliberations
in this regard. The intention is to run a national CSG registration
campaign together with the Department of Home Affairs and Social
Development.
children's
participation in social security policy making
The Alliance at the very outset made a commitment to ensuring that
children’s voices are heard in the policy making process.
To this end ACESS has, facilitated 18 workshops with groups of children
in all 9 provinces between September and December 2001. Children
living in different environments and experiencing different problems
and needs have been engaged in the consultative process. A report
of this process and the key findings, which have emerged, will be
available shortly to all ACESS members.

In
addition a smaller group of these children will be presenting their
findings and engaging indiscussions with key decision makers in
Cape Town in February 2002. As a member of ACESS you will have received
an invitation to this workshop. Unfortunately there is no funding
available to cover transport and other costs for those wishing to
attend. The children would appreciate your presence at the meeting.
Look
out for copies of the Children’s participation newsletters
to read what the children have to say about social security. These
are some of the things that were said by the children:
"My
family had no money for food. When I was alone sometimes I thought
I am a problem at home and maybe it's better to leave home and get
my food alone." (16 year old boy living on the streets)
"I
think that they should give Deaf children a special class at the
school. I am 18 and I want to learn in Sign. I learned Sign at Hammanskraal
and there it was all Deaf children. I had to leave there because
we had no money. Here they put me with the Grade 1 class and I am
with small children – I can learn nothing. I am just reading
books. I like to read so much. I read everything
but I have a favourite book - I will bring it for you tomorrow –
I read this book all the time – it is a dictionary with many
pictures. I know the signs for all the words in the dictionary –
I read it all the time." (18 year old boy who is deaf)

"In
my family there are two little ones – I look after them, they
are the ones I said I wash and dress everyday before I go to school.
They get a grant. It helps with the food and clothes for them. I
have heard it stops at 7 years. The older is 6 – what will
we do when it stops?" (16 year old girl from Mpumalanga)
"The
teachers shout at you. They say that we cannot sit on the seats
at school because we don’t pay school fees. People who sit
on the chairs are those who pay school fees. The teachers like to
swear at us. They don’t have a good way of approaching children.
They keep on teasing us about the school fees. It is not nice because
we also like to pay we just don’t have money".
(11 year old girl from the Northern Province)
people's
budget campaign - prioritising child social security!
People's Budget Campaign (PBC) was officially adopted at SANGOCO’s
National NGO Week in 1997. SANGOCO, SACC and COSATU then launched
the PBC in 2000, representing three key pillars of civil society,
churches, nongovernmental organisations and trade unions.
The PBC attempts to define fiscal strategies that advocate for a
pro-poor budget, support economic development, greater social spending
and promoting ordinary people's involvement and participation in
the budget process.
The
Draft People's Budget Framework Outline included the following key
proposals...
- Establishment
of a National Health Insurance
- Integrated
HIV/AIDS Treatment and Prevention Plan
- Basic
Income Grant
- Free Basic
Services
For
2002 SANGOCO has proposed that the demands concerning the Child
Support Grant be brought on board the PBC priorities and to this
end the PBC has resolved the following-:
- To include
in the PBC Educational Booklet a section on children's social
security
- To include
in a PB key demand proposal a section on children’s social
security in relation to Child Support Grants, Child Care Dependency
Grant, Foster Care Grant, etc.
- To establish
a Child Social Security Budget Task Team which will be tasked
with developing a press statement reflecting the expectations
and demands of the Child Social Security Campaign; analysing
the Budget from a Child Social Security perspective and making
a public response to the Budget via press releases and Press
Conference.
Teresa
Guthrie of the Children’s Institute [CI] drafted and coordinated
the submission from ACESS on Children’s Social Security for
the PBC and Paula Proudlock, also from the CI will serve as our
representative on the Budget Task Team.
Contact
either of them for more information.
functioning
of acess
As
indicated previously ACESS has operated with a small core of organisations
that have committed both their own personnel and resources to the
ACESS Alliance. This has had its limitations, most obvious of which
is the limited communication between the Alliance and its 65 odd
members nation wide.
In
a strategic planning session recently ACESS explored how to address
these and other constraints to embarking on a massive campaign on
social security for all. It is our hope that together we can as
an Alliance make a difference to the lives of vulnerable children
in South Africa.
Two
key activities, which ACESS hopes to be able to facilitate, are
provincial / regional meetings of ACESS members and the convening
of a national consultative meeting of the child rights sector to
chart a pathway for ACESS for 2002 and beyond.
Our
fundraising efforts have been initiated to support these plans.
Your ideas and support are vital.
acess's
research agenda
Research
is being undertaken and information gathered that will enhance the
development of a comprehensive social security system. Progress
in this regard has been limited by lack of funds for full-time researchers.
If
you know of people who should become members of ACESS, share this
information with them and invite their participation. Only as an
Alliance can we become a force that will not be ignored.
Yours
sincerely
Shirin
Motala
For Alliance for Children’s Entitlement to Social Security
contact
the alliance
For
further information on ACESS and its activities, please contact
one of the Task Team or Reference Team members listed below:
Shirin
Motala
Children's Rights Centre
Tel: 031 - 209 6230
083 7868844
shirinm@wn.apc.org
Shereen
Usdin
Soul City
Tel: 011 - 643 5852
082 652 4844
shereenu@soulcity.org.za
Teresa
Guthrie or Paula Proudlock
Children's Institute, UCT
Tel: 021 - 685 4053/ 685 1583
082 872 4694
teresa@rmh.uct.ac.za /
paula@rmh.uct.ac. za
This
Newsletter was designed by
Zama Mvulane, Children’s Institute, University of
Cape Town
and
converted to HTML by
TriWeb
cc
|
|